Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AstralSat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AstralSat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Don't meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH Asketbouncer (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added some references, and I think notability is now demonstrated. The corresponding article in the Portuguese-language Wikipedia has been deleted. AstralSat may have suspended operations or been taken over by another company, but I think it was notable while it existed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. Eastmain added some references (all the references) and there is one, that meets the criteria for establishing notability, this company analysis report from Digitgaps as it includes analysis and fact-checking and meets WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. I'm of the opinion that a company is very rarely given this much analysis by a single analyst and although I have been unable to locate another reference, I'm happy enough to believe that one exists in Portuguese and I'm simply unable to locate it - see WP:NEXIST HighKing⁺⁺ 20:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per HighKing.4meter4 (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.